Lorie+Kryk-resources

**Resource 1:**
Giles, Rebecca M., & Shaw, Edward L. (2011). SMART Boards ROCK. Science and Children, 49(4), 36-37. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/docview/916224652/fulltextPDF/13E956BBEC34B9BBA0E/4?accountid=12598__

This article gives new inspiration for teachers to bridge hands-on and deeper exploration of scientific knowledge. It was refreshing to see that the author also included the standards mentioned in the article to benefit the teachers. As a kindergarten teacher, completing larger science experiments can be very difficult or even dangerous. However, this article made me think about the ease of showing advanced science experiments would be danger-free and allow faster transitions to other material without the clean-up. Kindergartens are not always the quickest at cleaning up large messes. Although I thought it was wise for Giles and Shaw to stick to one particular science topic (rocks), it would have been nice to hear some of the other science units they completed on a smart board. Overall, I was very pleased with Giles and Shaw's ability to cover so much material in a condensed amount of space.
 * Summary and Critique: **

**Resource 2:**
Starkman, Neal. (2006). The Wonders of Interactive WHITEBOARDS. T.H.E. Journal, 33 (10), 36-38. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/docview/214821379/fulltextPDF/13E95C0FD105261C122/1?accountid=12598__ http://te831us13.wikispaces.com/Lorie+Kryk-resources I thought Starkman did a solid job at informing educators how smart boards work and the inner workings within the industry. I felt as though I walked away with more knowledge after finishing the article. My favorite part was hearing about Enjamin Hazzard sharing numerous whiteboard lessons on free Podcast. I was happily surprised to see that his site was still active and available for students, parents, and teachers. The main drawback that I found with this article was the lack information directly related to elementary students. I felt that the article contained that drawback but also gave the reader more leads to follow to discover more information.
 * Summary and Critique: **

**Resource 3:**
__ WIKIBOOKS: Open books for an open world. (2011). Tidbits in Tech: Integration in Education/Smart Boards in the Elementary School. Retrieved from http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Tidbits_in_Tech:_Integration_in_Education/Smart_Boards_in_the_Elementary_School __

The information contained in this book is highly well-rounded and useful. I love the fact that they touch base on all the aspects of using the smart boards (aka interactive white boards). One of my favorite parts of this book is the fact that they gave a tremendous amount of helpful sites and links to articles and video demonstrations that can assist teachers with using interactive white boards in a more meaningful manner. I was excited about investigating more ways I could use my smart board with my students following this book. Another aspect that I respected was the disadvantage section they shared with the readers. I didn't feel like they were just pushing their agenda, but rather giving the reader a well-rounded viewpoint. This piece of writing complemented the SCOT theory nicely and even gave me a new, more positive, perspective on the SCOT theory. I absolutely loved that they spoke about integrating each individual subject with the interactive white board technology. This was super helpful for me as the educator. They managed to break it down into individual curriculum subjects as well. This is a must read for anyone who has interactive white board technology in their school or expect it to come.
 * Summary and Critique: **